|
Post by DADDY O on Mar 19, 2017 17:46:21 GMT
Seriously...............what happened to the concept of "Dress for Success"?
When you get them both together......................it's pretty damn scary. So, who's hair is the worst? My money goes on the "Trumpster".
|
|
|
Post by sherri on Mar 19, 2017 21:23:43 GMT
He wins by a country mile, as they say.
He has the classic hair comb over style some men adopt as they get older. They think it hides any bald or thinning patches. It doesn't. He needs a different stylist but having said that, men in politics usually come under a lot less scrutiny and criticism than women politicians.
|
|
|
Post by DADDY O on Mar 20, 2017 5:48:13 GMT
I think it's his ego that controls his haircut.
Big ego...........thin skinned.....recipe for failure.
|
|
|
Post by mrp on Mar 20, 2017 11:17:10 GMT
With all of his money...why he didn't do "Advanced Hair" (yeah yeah!) is beyond me.
|
|
|
Post by DADDY O on Mar 20, 2017 13:21:32 GMT
Maybe he doesn't have any money?
Think about it.
|
|
|
Post by mrp on Mar 21, 2017 1:21:32 GMT
That's why he employs 22,000 people?
|
|
|
Post by DADDY O on Mar 21, 2017 9:37:17 GMT
I learned a long time ago, It's not the number of people that drives your income.............just the opposite.
|
|
|
Post by sherri on Mar 21, 2017 20:51:03 GMT
I think people must have different definitions of broke. This guy is not without a penny. His wife is in designer gear & he has knocked back the presidential pay.
I've noticed a few people over here(not presidents, admittedly), usually people who have been in the public eye, people such as Geoffrey Edelstein or one of his ex's. Some people like this will claim they are totally broke, hardly know where the next dollar is coming from, then you read that the poor person has had to sell up and is reduced to having to rent a small villa in Toorak (a wealthy suburb).
Ordinary families on low wages couldn't afford to rent in Toorak. That's not my definition of poor.
|
|